<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>	<!-- generator="wordpress/2.7.1" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
			>
	<channel>
		<title>OER Blogs</title>
		<link>http://oerblogs.org</link>
		<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
		<language>en</language>
						<item>
					<title>Sundown in Southwestern France</title>
					<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/rhfkDNzJiUE/sundown_in_southwestern_france.html</link>
					<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/rhfkDNzJiUE/sundown_in_southwestern_france.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Two weeks in Southwestern France. All footage was shot by Jon Bryant simply using a Canon 7D. You can also watch the video directly on Vimeo here. Via @brainpicker. Sundown in Southwestern France is a post from: Open Culture. Visit us at www.openculture.com<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2010/09/sundown_in_southwestern_france.html">Sundown in Southwestern France</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a>. Visit us at <a href="http://www.openculture.com/">www.openculture.com</a></p>
]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>NASA Lauches Photo Archive on Flickr</title>
					<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/jsM-6cTBE0U/nasa_lauches_photo_archive_on_flickr.html</link>
					<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/jsM-6cTBE0U/nasa_lauches_photo_archive_on_flickr.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[This week, NASA rolled a big archive of historical images into Flickr Commons, giving users access to more than a half century of NASA’s photographic history. The images are divided into three neat sets – &#8220;Launch and Takeoff,&#8221; &#8220;Building NASA&#8221; and &#8220;Center Namesakes&#8221; – and they&#8217;re all copyright-free, meaning that you can share and use these images however [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2010/09/nasa_lauches_photo_archive_on_flickr.html">NASA Lauches Photo Archive on Flickr</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a>. Visit us at <a href="http://www.openculture.com/">www.openculture.com</a></p>
]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Directgov Review - No Time to Lose</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/09/directgov-review-no-time-to-lose.html</link>
					<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/09/directgov-review-no-time-to-lose.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>One of the heartening trends that I've noted in recent years is a gradually opening up of government around the world - in both directions. As well as making more data available, the UK government too is also beginning to realise that the public wants - and can - help by providing input on the things that affect and matter to them.</blockquote></span><br />On <a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2010/09/directgov-review---no-time-to-lose/index.htm">Open Enterprise blog</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-7201481808752062224?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=S0p_tD4D4Pg:9609dvV1tKE:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=S0p_tD4D4Pg:9609dvV1tKE:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Animated Noir: Key Lime Pie</title>
					<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/lzlqdBkmouk/animated_noir_key_lime_pie.html</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/lzlqdBkmouk/animated_noir_key_lime_pie.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Put simply, you&#8217;ll probably never see a noir film quite like this. Key Lime Pie was directed by Trevor Jimenez in 2007, and recommended on Twitter by Joaquin Baldwin, a talented young animator featured on Open Culture some months ago. It runs a quick 3 and a half minutes. Animated Noir: Key Lime Pie is [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2010/09/animated_noir_key_lime_pie.html">Animated Noir: Key Lime Pie</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a>. Visit us at <a href="http://www.openculture.com/">www.openculture.com</a></p>
]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>The Truth about Fakes (and Piracy)</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/09/truth-about-fakes-and-piracy.html</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/09/truth-about-fakes-and-piracy.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Here's a fascinating <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/7969335/Fake-goods-are-fine-says-EU-study.html">item</a>:<br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>A new EU-funded report has declared that it is OK to buy fake designer goods.<br /><br />The study, co-written by a Home Office adviser, says consumers benefit from the market for knock-off designer clothes at knock-down prices.<br /><br />It also rejects the complaints of designer companies, claiming that losses to the industry as a result of counterfeiting are vastly exaggerated – because most of those who buy fakes would never pay for the real thing – and finding that the rip-off goods can actually promote their brands.<br /><br />The report adds that the police should not waste their time trying to stop the bootleggers.<br /><br />It disputes claims that the counterfeiting of luxury brands is funding terrorism and organised crime, and argues there is little public appetite for tough law enforcement measures as consumers enjoy the bargains offered by the illegal trade, which has been estimated to be worth £1.3 billion in the UK.<br /><br />Professor David Wall, who co-authored the report and advises the government on crime, said the real cost to the industry from counterfeiting could be one-fifth of previously calculated figures. </blockquote></span><br />There are a number of interesting points here.<br /><br />First, is the obvious one of what the research claims about the difference between the real threat of fakes and the, er, fake threat that the industry likes to proclaim.<br /><br />Secondly, there is the similarity between what is going on here and what the content industries claim about the extent and damage of piracy.<br /><br />But in many ways the most striking thing about this story, which effectively declares fake goods to be socially acceptable these days, is its provenance.  It appeared not in some lefty rag, but in the <span style="font-style:italic;">The Daily Telegaph</span>, not known for its whacky, pinko leanings.  <br /><br />My reading of this is that whatever the industries concerned might say about how awful, deceptive and damaging fakes and piracy are to the economy, ordinary people - and the newspapers that try to mirror their views - know that the true picture is rather different.  It also means that ACTA is even more wrong-headed than even I thought.<br /><br />Follow me @glynmoody on <a href=http://twitter.com/glynmoody>Twitter</a> or <a href=http://identi.ca/glynmoody>identi.ca</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-4985946384603124927?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=FfGaGfhWcng:XF4jlBmGwUs:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=FfGaGfhWcng:XF4jlBmGwUs:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Mahara: Who'd Have Thought?</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/09/mahara-whod-have-thought.html</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/09/mahara-whod-have-thought.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[One of the things that warms the cockles of my heart is the widening ripple of open source.  Starting, as it did, with core system software, it is now moving ever further into more specialised areas.  Take <a href="http://mahara.org/">Mahara</a>, for example:<br /><span style="font-style:italic;"><br /><blockquote>an open source e-portfolio system with a flexible display framework. Mahara, meaning 'think' or 'thought' in Te Reo M?ori, is user centred environment with a permissions framework that enables different views of an e-portfolio to be easily managed. Mahara also features a weblog, resume builder and social networking system, connecting users and creating online learner communities.</blockquote></span><br />This is part of the power of free software: however good it is today, it will be *even* better tomorrow, because old programs are never discontinued (even if they are no longer actively supported).  <br /><br />Don't you just love monotonicity?<br /><br />Follow me @glynmoody on <a href=http://twitter.com/glynmoody>Twitter</a> or <a href=http://identi.ca/glynmoody>identi.ca</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-445515293102495328?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=S2xUv68plfU:hNqrOEtrdXM:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=S2xUv68plfU:hNqrOEtrdXM:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Could this Lawsuit Undermine the GNU GPL?</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/09/could-this-lawsuit-undermine-gnu-gpl.html</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 05:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/09/could-this-lawsuit-undermine-gnu-gpl.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>As I've noted before, it's pretty well established that the GNU GPL stands up in the courts: gone are the days when detractors of copyleft could claim it would “never work”. But the GPL is still under attack, only in more subtle ways, so the open source world can't just sit back and relax.</blockquote></span><br />On <a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2010/09/could-this-lawsuit-undermine-the-gnu-gpl/index.htm">Open Enterprise blog</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-7942173148890493764?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=8ldyK_RoBcg:g8ZmW5kwNW0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=8ldyK_RoBcg:g8ZmW5kwNW0:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Foreworld as Foretaste</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/09/foreworld-as-foretaste.html</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/09/foreworld-as-foretaste.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[I'm am currently staggering to the end of Neal Stephenson's <span style="font-style:italic;">The Confusion</span>, loving every minute of this impossible, wandering, hyperbolic, anachronistic, shaggy-dog story.  So I was naturally delighted to see that he (along with a band of fellow creators) is not only working on yet another huge, outrageously-ambitious epic, <span style="font-style:italic;">The Mongoliad</span>, but one that <a href="http://mongoliad.com/">pushes</a> story-telling in new directions by using technology:<br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>Our story unfolds in weekly installments over the course of a year. We've planned out a true epic—the last great epic of the middle ages, in fact--and written a fine chunk of the tale, but much depends on you. We’re hoping you’ll ultimately interact with our artists and writers and share in the story’s creation.<br /><br />When we can, we'll include extra tidbits of art, video, music and history. Those extras will be made available to premium subscribers, an excellent value--less than the price of a hardback book for a year's worth of story and mixed-media entertainment. We’ll soon be taking subscriptions for app delivery to some of the most popular mobile devices and are working hard to add more.<br /><br />The user-editable Foreworld 'Pedia is the ultimate repository of all information about our world. Some of it coincides with the world you know. Some does not. We welcome your additions. </blockquote></span><br />I was particularly heartened to find the following <a href="http://mongoliad.com/faq">intelligent approach</a> to DRM - or lack of it:<br /><span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote><br />We put in a lot of effort on an ongoing basis to ensure that the best value our fans can get out of our stuff is by participating interactively with us and each other, and enjoying our interwoven content in context, in the way it was meant to be enjoyed. So, we think that if people take our content without our permission, their experience will be suboptimal, and given our modest prices, we think most people will be happy to pay us, thereby enabling this experiment to keep evolving. That said, the bits that can be copied and pasted and put into a torrent are still going to be fun, and people are going to end up redistributing those bits without our permission and against our wishes. However, we still don't use DRM. </blockquote></span><br />The reasoning is absolutely spot-on:<br /><span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote><br />The biggest reason is that DRM is futile, and we don't like to waste our time doing things that aren't going to be effective, and which are just going to annoy our legit supporters. Our concentration is on providing great experiences and great customer service to our customers, and we trust that those people who really appreciate what we are doing will become our customers. Because it's part of our ethos to be constantly producing and expanding and improving our work, the pirated content people may find elsewhere online will be static and out-of-date copies; we think that when people find this stuff it may give them a taste of what the full experience is like; hopefully, that taste will be enough that they'll want more, and in seeking out more, will become happy (and paying) customers of ours. We like that. </blockquote></span><br />That is, piracy isn't a real problem if you *out-innovate* the pirates, making your paid-for offering better than their free one.  Indeed, if you do, pirated copies become like tasters, encouraging people to upgrade and pay for the full, latest version.  Similarly, by the sound of it, part of the strength of this project will be the interweaving of other elements into the text - again, something that pirates can't offer.<br /><br />But I think this is slightly off the mark:<br /><span style="font-style:italic;"><br /><blockquote>However, we don't believe that pirates are doing us any favors, and our not using DRM is not an invitation to cadge our stuff. Because of the way intellectual property law in this country (and most other jurisdictions) works, we are obligated to defend our copyrights, trademarks, and other IP--otherwise we lose them: if we find piracy we will try to stop it; if we find unauthorized use of our IP at commercial scale and/or commercial intent, we will come after it with vigor, because we have to.</blockquote></span><br />That may be true for trademarks, but not, I think, for copyright: it's not something you have to "defend".  Still, quibbles, aside, I'm looking forward to seeing what Stephenson and his fellow creators get up to here.  I also hope that this new Foreworld proves something of a foretaste of future extended novels - not least in terms of dropping DRM.<br /><br />As for reading it, well, I have the small matter of <span style="font-style:italic;">The Baroque Cycle</span> to finish first: I may be gone some time...<br /><br />Follow me @glynmoody on <a href=http://twitter.com/glynmoody>Twitter</a> or <a href=http://identi.ca/glynmoody>identi.ca</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-5502964235683722531?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=D57bG8Tt3sI:_VqIGiob8WA:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=D57bG8Tt3sI:_VqIGiob8WA:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>What Makes Us Human?</title>
					<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/jUc08UktI6Q/what_makes_us_human.html</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/jUc08UktI6Q/what_makes_us_human.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Some of the most basic questions about human existence (how did we develop language? why do we love music and art but kill in war? how did we develop certain eating habits? etc.) come back to a more singular question: how are we different from chimpanzees? This question is slowly getting answered by some of [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2010/09/what_makes_us_human.html">What Makes Us Human?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a>. Visit us at <a href="http://www.openculture.com/">www.openculture.com</a></p>
]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Syllabus & Book List for Sci-Fi Newbies</title>
					<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/-iu4WLcEvA4/syllabus_book_list_for_sci-fi_newbies.html</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/-iu4WLcEvA4/syllabus_book_list_for_sci-fi_newbies.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Always wanted to read science fiction? But never knew where to start? io9, a blog dedicated to futurism and sci-fi, has you covered. Today, they published a handy sci-fi syllabus/reading list &#8220;intended to introduce the novice student &#8230; to the major themes in the genre, as well as books and authors who are representative of different eras [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2010/09/syllabus_book_list_for_sci-fi_newbies.html">Syllabus &#038; Book List for Sci-Fi Newbies</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a>. Visit us at <a href="http://www.openculture.com/">www.openculture.com</a></p>
]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Seven Ages of the Body</title>
					<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/tHQUvMuTrnc/seven_ages_of_the_body.html</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/tHQUvMuTrnc/seven_ages_of_the_body.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[This new video from Cambridge University, featuring archaeologist John Robb, gives you a quick and visually appealing introduction to how humans have understood something we take for granted – our own bodies. Covering 10,000 years in six minutes, Robb takes us from the &#8220;Animal Body&#8221; and &#8220;Sexualized Body&#8221; of the Mesolithic and Neolithic Ages, to [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2010/09/seven_ages_of_the_body.html">Seven Ages of the Body</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a>. Visit us at <a href="http://www.openculture.com/">www.openculture.com</a></p>
]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Ukraine to Create is Own GNU/Linux Distro</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/09/ukraine-to-create-is-own-gnulinux.html</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/09/ukraine-to-create-is-own-gnulinux.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[I've been <a href="http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2009/01/russia-to-create-national-os-based-on.html">writing</a> for a while about Russia's on-off idea of creating its own GNU/Linux distro.  It <a href="http://ukranews.com/uk/news/ukraine/2010/08/31/25919">looks</a> like Ukraine is following suit.  Via <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fukranews.com%2Fuk%2Fnews%2Fukraine%2F2010%2F08%2F31%2F25919">Google Translate</a>:<br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>its purpose is to optimize the expenditure of budgetary funds and the solution using unlicensed software in state bodies.<br /><br />According to estimates from officials, the savings of switching apparatus to free software can be 87%.<br /><br />Among the expected outcomes of the program - improving the legal framework of research on creation and use of open software infrastructure for its development, creation and dissemination, and coordination of state infrastructure using open source software in the bodies derzhvlady, a basic set of localized distribution, adapted to the needs of public authorities. </blockquote></span><br />Let's hope it doesn't get so bogged down as the Russian one.<br /><br />Follow me @glynmoody on <a href=http://twitter.com/glynmoody>Twitter</a> or <a href=http://identi.ca/glynmoody>identi.ca</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-2150771112355047333?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=hWWCVk24dKM:meh9pOqwyi4:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=hWWCVk24dKM:meh9pOqwyi4:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Philip Roth’s Creative Surge & the Death of the Novel</title>
					<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/TMS7ZCwHQrA/philip_roths_creative_surge_the_death_of_the_novel.html</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 02:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/TMS7ZCwHQrA/philip_roths_creative_surge_the_death_of_the_novel.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Philip Roth, now 77 years old, keeps publishing with a certain urgency. Everyman in 2006, Exit Ghost in 2007, Indignation 2008, The Humbling last year, and next comes Nemesis, due to be released in early October. After The Humbling hit the shelves, magazine editor Tina Brown conducted a rare video interview with Roth, and they covered a fair [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2010/08/philip_roths_creative_surge_the_death_of_the_novel.html">Philip Roth&#8217;s Creative Surge &#038; the Death of the Novel</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a>. Visit us at <a href="http://www.openculture.com/">www.openculture.com</a></p>
]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>The Power of Music</title>
					<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/LWyG7rg3O7E/the_power_of_music.html</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/LWyG7rg3O7E/the_power_of_music.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[The video says it all. CNN has more on Captain Jack&#8230; via Alec Couros aka @courosa The Power of Music is a post from: Open Culture. Visit us at www.openculture.com<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2010/08/the_power_of_music.html">The Power of Music</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a>. Visit us at <a href="http://www.openculture.com/">www.openculture.com</a></p>
]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>What Paul Allen and Larry Ellison Have in Common</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/what-paul-allen-and-larry-ellison-have.html</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/what-paul-allen-and-larry-ellison-have.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>At first sight, this extraordinary legal action against most of the digital world's leading lights might seem one of a kind:<br /><br />Interval Licensing LLC ("Interval"), a Paul G. Allen company, filed a complaint today in the U.S. District Court of the Western District of Washington against major internet search and e-commerce companies alleging that they have infringed on four patents held by Interval. The eleven defendants are AOL, Apple, eBay, Facebook, Google, Netflix, Office Depot, OfficeMax, Staples, Yahoo, and YouTube.</blockquote></span><br />On <a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2010/08/what-larry-ellison-and-paul-allen-have-in-common/index.htm">Open Enterprise blog</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-8721372134737402951?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=alx6EpCFh6U:SAsiWxMsWOk:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=alx6EpCFh6U:SAsiWxMsWOk:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Richard Feynman: Fun to Imagine</title>
					<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/OmbkZKetnXA/richard_feynman_fun_to_imagine.html</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 03:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/OmbkZKetnXA/richard_feynman_fun_to_imagine.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Back in 1983, the BBC aired Fun to Imagine, a television series hosted by Richard Feynman that used physics to explain how the everyday world works – &#8220;why rubber bands are stretchy, why tennis balls can&#8217;t bounce forever, and what you&#8217;re really seeing when you look in the mirror.&#8221; In case you&#8217;re not familiar with him, [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2010/08/richard_feynman_fun_to_imagine.html">Richard Feynman: Fun to Imagine</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a>. Visit us at <a href="http://www.openculture.com/">www.openculture.com</a></p>
]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Journalism for Our Century</title>
					<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/WR1JOWWcuGc/journalism_for_our_century.html</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dan Colman</dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenCulture/~3/WR1JOWWcuGc/journalism_for_our_century.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[As journalists try to find their footing in the new digital environment, News21, a Carnegie and Knight initiative, has started &#8220;incubating&#8221; eight journalism schools across the country and helping students develop new forms of investigative reporting in multimedia formats. Above, we have Spilling Over, a piece of digital reporting that lays bare the emotional toll [...]<p><a href="http://www.openculture.com/2010/08/journalism_for_our_century.html">Journalism for Our Century</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.openculture.com">Open Culture</a>. Visit us at <a href="http://www.openculture.com/">www.openculture.com</a></p>
]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Don't be Neutral about Net Neutrality</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/dont-be-neutral-about-net-neutrality.html</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/dont-be-neutral-about-net-neutrality.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>A little while ago, I noted that Ofcom was seeking input on the subject of Net neutrality. I also promised to post my own submission, which I've included below.<br /><br />Ofcom has put together a very useful discussion paper [.pdf], and invites comments via an online form. Alternatively, you can send comments directly to traffic.management@ofcom.org.uk. In either case, responses need to be in by 9 September.</blockquote></span><br />On O<a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2010/08/dont-be-neutral-about-net-neutrality-1/index.htm">pen Enterprise blog</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-3448526790756983089?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=NAt5uIKCzBs:jC5NVKX-Vto:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=NAt5uIKCzBs:jC5NVKX-Vto:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Oracle Scorns Open Source: How to Respond?</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/oracle-scorns-open-source-how-to.html</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/oracle-scorns-open-source-how-to.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>This was bound to happen, of course. Things were going too well. At a time when Google is activating 200,000 Android phones a day, and Android has overtaken the iPhone in terms of US market share, Oracle decided to drop the bomb:</blockquote></span><br />On <a href="http://bit.ly/dd6lAO ">Open Enterprise blog</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-4039253138711779825?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=wnZya7oTX0Q:8eHnpEzYOEA:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=wnZya7oTX0Q:8eHnpEzYOEA:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Greed vs. Survival: Which Prevails?</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/greed-vs-survival-which-prevails.html</link>
					<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/greed-vs-survival-which-prevails.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[The global environmental catastrophe that we all face is, of course, a typical tragedy of the (analogue) commons.  Resources that are held in common like the atmosphere, or water, or fisheries are exploited for short-term gain by powerful players able to push to the front.  <br /><br />But it's often hard to grasp these tragedies because of their vast scale; what we need is something smaller, more human in dimension that pits personal gain against common weal to make obvious what should be the outcome of that struggle if we want to survive as a species.  Something like <a href="http://food.change.org/blog/view/russias_pavlovsk_seed_vault_threatened_by_real_estate_developers">this</a>:<br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>It's hard to imagine a more agriculturally vibrant place than Russia's Pavlovsk Experiment Station near St. Petersburg. The "station," part of the N.I. Vavilov Research Institute of Plant Industry, really isn't a laboratory at all — it's a global seed vault holding tens of thousands of living, growing plants. As USA Today recently reported, "there are apples from 35 countries, 1,000 varieties of strawberries from 40 countries, black currants from 30 countries, plums from 12 countries and multiple other crops."</blockquote></span><br />And what do they propose to do with that wonder of the seeds commons?  This:<br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>Last year, the Russian Ministry of Economic Development transferred the rights to two of Vavilov Research Institute's tracts of land to the Russian Federal Fund of Residential Real Estate. A Russian court will likely rule on Wednesday whether developers can move forward with development plans for the land. If real estate developers succeed, all those thousands of varieties of crops — 90 percent of which are not found anywhere else in the world — will be bulldozed to make way for luxury homes.</blockquote></span><br /><a href="http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/57617/">In fact</a>:<br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>The fate of the collection at the Pavlovsk Experimental Station,  which includes more than 70 hectares planted with 5,500 different varieties of apples, pears, cherries, and numerous berry species -- most of which occur nowhere else on Earth and were developed over hundreds of years by farmers in northern Europe, Scandinavia and Russia -- was decided in Russia's Supreme Arbitration Court at 10:30 AM, Moscow time. </blockquote></span><br />The result? Send in the bulldozers: who cares about the future of food?<br /><br />If the proposal seems utterly outrageous, the reasoning behind it is utterly <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/aug/08/pavlovsk-seed-bank-russia">insulting</a>:<br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>the property developers argue that because the station contains a "priceless collection", no monetary value can be assigned to it and so it is worthless. In another nod to Kafka, the government's federal fund of residential real estate development has argued that the collection was never registered and thus does not officially exist.</blockquote></span><br />What's particularly galling is that the sums involved are <a href="http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/57617/">quite small</a>:<br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>the developer, the Housing Development Foundation, would pay 92 million rubles (more than USD $3 million) to acquire a special, five-year leasing license on the 70 hectares. After that five-year period, they'd have the opportunity to own the land outright.</blockquote></span><br />Surely, then, this would be a great way for one of those high-profile modern philanthropists - hello, Bill Gates - to do something amazingly powerful for the world at minimal effective cost to their foundations.<br /><br />Failing that, little people like you and mean can <a href=http://www.change.org/croptrust/petitions/view/tell_the_president_of_russia_to_stop_the_destruction_of_the_future_of_food>send a couple of tweets, and sign a petition</a>.  That's not much, but sadly it's all we can do to prevent this all-too graspable tragedy of the commons.<br /><br />Follow me @glynmoody on <a href=http://twitter.com/glynmoody>Twitter</a> or <a href=http://identi.ca/glynmoody>identi.ca</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-8140540697062541802?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=jNrWwlw5IRw:cNntYcriYGE:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=jNrWwlw5IRw:cNntYcriYGE:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Linux Foundation Makes Enterprise Open Source Boring</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/linux-foundation-makes-enterprise-open.html</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/linux-foundation-makes-enterprise-open.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>In the early days of free software, the struggle was just to get companies to try this new and rather unconventional approach, without worrying too much about how that happened. That typically meant programs entering by the back door, surreptitiously installed by in-house engineers who understood the virtues of the stuff - and that it was easier to ask for forgiveness after the event than for permission before.</blockquote></span><br />On <a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2010/08/enterprise-open-source-is-boring---and-thats-good/index.htm">Open Enterprise blog</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-7449314132391494348?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=3tAFHNrpVeA:XBr3J9LlRfI:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=3tAFHNrpVeA:XBr3J9LlRfI:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>?The Saga of Git: Lightning does Strike Twice</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/saga-of-git-lightning-does-strike-twice.html</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/saga-of-git-lightning-does-strike-twice.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>Every now and then, a shiver runs through the Linux community as people realise afresh that the entire edifice has a single point of failure: Linus Torvalds. These episodes usually manifest themselves as concerns about the scalability of said individual – whether he can continue to oversee and manage the amazing distributed development model as it grows ever bigger and more ambitious. To counter those fears it is probably worth looking at what happened as a result of the first – and by far the most frightening - “Linus does not scale” episode, not least because it led to multiple positive outcomes.</blockquote></span><br />On <a href="http://www.h-online.com/open/features/The-saga-of-Git-Lightning-does-strike-twice-1051559.html">The H Open</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-8228038901726429277?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=bKWJMf_UCr8:cmePDiml3gA:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=bKWJMf_UCr8:cmePDiml3gA:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>The Dead Microsoft Sketch</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/dead-microsoft-sketch.html</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 08:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/dead-microsoft-sketch.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>The first time I was really impressed by Microsoft was back in the 1980s. I was being given a private demonstration of a hot new program for the Macintosh. I was struck not just by the beta's cool new graphical interface - a clear advance on existing DOS programs like 1-2-3 - but also by the infectious enthusiasm of the Microsoftie showing me around the beta. The program, as you've probably guessed, was Excel; the person doing the demo was Bill Gates.</blockquote></span><br />On <a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2010/08/the-dead-microsoft-sketch/index.htm">Open Enterprise blog</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-3226560298461809109?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=FaShaRe_dgY:o3Qm68k-FKA:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=FaShaRe_dgY:o3Qm68k-FKA:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Is Google About to Sell the Internet Down the River?</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/is-google-about-to-sell-internet-down.html</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 04:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/is-google-about-to-sell-internet-down.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>Net neutrality is turning from a boring, irrelevant issue that few people thought about much into one of the key issues for today's Internet. Sadly, that's because a few powerful industry groups in the US have started spending lots of money to bolster their weakening positions in a shifting world, and that means obscure technicalities like Net neutrality become collateral damage in the collective stampede to get to the feeding troughs. </blockquote></span><br />On <a href="http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2010/08/is-google-about-to-sell-the-internet-down-the-river/index.htm">Open Enterprise blog</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-4465951740604661995?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=XaMfEk-WDxI:UqSamMAB4sA:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=XaMfEk-WDxI:UqSamMAB4sA:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>El Pueblo Unido...</title>
					<link>http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/el-pueblo-unido.html</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>glyn moody <noreply@blogger.com></dc:creator>
												<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
												<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/08/el-pueblo-unido.html</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Videos are proving to be a key element in ensuring that policing is fair and honest, as recent events in the UK have demonstrated.  But there's a subtlety here that I hadn't realised until reading <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/jul/19/gaza-protests-inquiry-police-cctv">this</a>:<br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;"><blockquote>More worrying is the way in which CCTV is being used by the police. Demonstrator Jake Smith  was charged with two counts of violent disorder. These charges were later dropped when Smith's solicitor, Matt Foot, viewed the original CCTV footage and discovered that the police video had been edited  to show events out of sequence, at one point implying another man was Smith while omitting footage showing Smith being assaulted by a police officer without provocation.<br /><br />Considering the potential for abuse of power, the control that the police have had over the use of CCTV is frightening. Foot warns, "We should be both curious and suspicious about how the police use CCTV footage in these cases."<br /><br />Foot's concern extends to how police have dictated the use of their edited material. Solicitors representing the protesters were told to sign an undertaking by the Met that prevented them sharing their police videos with anyone but their client. This stopped defence solicitors working together to establish a wider picture of the protests and their context. This worked hand in hand with the decision to charge all the protesters individually rather than collectively.</blockquote></span><br />The first point is obvious enough: those charged with offences need to be able to see the *full* video footage that includes the parts used by the police.  But the second is just as important: in order to obtain a full, rounded picture of what *really* happened - or a good approximation thereto - people must be able to pool video resources.  Both of these need to be enshrined as explicit rights if we are to nip in the bud the tendency for the Boys in Blue to get selective in their editing, and for true justice to be done.<br /><br />Follow me @glynmoody on <a href=http://twitter.com/glynmoody>Twitter</a> or <a href=http://identi.ca/glynmoody>identi.ca</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/19798349-3546578495428870835?l=opendotdotdot.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=N48MeQgnmrU:mwCB5dv4iHI:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?a=N48MeQgnmrU:mwCB5dv4iHI:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Open?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></description>
				</item>
					</channel>
	</rss>
	